Autocad solidworks market share

Our solution helps to reach these customers via direct mail, email, and telemarketing campaign. Small and mid-sized firms across the world need digital solutions to outgrow their business, but have faced challenges in finding the right one. The Solidworks 3D experience environment is perfectly tailored to meet the needs of the SMBs everywhere. The work combines the collaboration with simulation, design, and manufacturing ERP capabilities in a digital environment.

Our solution is a comprehensive database, which helps you to reach the companies that use Solidworks accurately. As the mailing list is updated every three months, you can seamlessly connect with your prospect.

The validation and verification process ensures that accurate data is included in the database. So, reach out to the companies that use Solidworks in different countries such as Australia, Ireland, Denmark, UK, US, Canada, and others by integrating our mailing solution in your marketing campaign.

Please submit your requirement below and we will get in touch with you shortly.! Please enter your contact information below and we will get back to you shortly. Name your name. Company Email Company Email email. Phone Number call. Company Name. Submit Your Requirement. Counts By Country. Solidworks Customers by Country. Counts By US Region. Solidworks Customers by US State. Counts By industry. Solidworks Customers by Industry.

Counts By Revenue. This is an interesting category because it shows how many who tried decided to buy. Therefore, these numbers are indicative of satisfaction achieved during a trial when evaluating the software.

Solidworks had slightly edged out Fusion last year but now it is the reverse. Adoption rates look good for all the top contenders on market share and the list is sorted with higher market share at bottom of the graph. This all provides friction that slows down market share changes. The number looking to change is a little higher than last year, but not enough to suggest major market shifts. Like last year, a question was asked to determine the relative Free plus educational and pirated share vs paid share of the packages.

Times were definitely tough with the Pandemic. For a market leader, that is an extremely large drop. The interesting thing about free, is just as nature abhors a vacuum, shareholders abhor a lack of profits. Sooner or later most free things tend to get a lot less free.

Free is typically used as a tool to accelerate growth until market dominance can be achieved. We saw that prediction come true this year as Autodesk slapped a bunch of limitations on the free version of F Things like no tool changes and no G00 rapids.

Apparently it made a huge difference if the increase in paid market share is any indication. Pros need different capabilities than Hobbyists, and they can afford to pay more for their tools. For example, Pros need to be able to exchange files in whatever format their customers operate, so it is much more important for them to use higher market share products.

Hobbyists, meanwhile, want simplicity and low cost first and foremost while raw power is number 2. Not surprisingly, F is by far the leader for the Hobby segment. After all, it offers Pro-level power at an amazingly cheap price. I admit I am surprised to find SolidWorks in the 2 position. Fabulous product, but WAY too much money for most hobbyists. Rhino3D seems to be falling off. Onshape continues to fall.

No surprise. They pretty much snubbed the hobby world early on when they abruptly changed the nature of their free offering to make it almost unusable. As I mentioned, Pro users have different needs from Hobbyists. Solidworks continues to enjoy commanding market share for Pro users, even though it has fallen off a bit since last year. Despite the tendency for Pros to adopt slowly, F made subtantial gains, going from We awarded 2 points for It Rocks! Based on those responses, we award a Gold and a Silver Customer Satisfaction Award to the first and second place packages.

As such, you can see the overall trend for these products. For most of the products the trend has been downward. The Pandemic did not put CAD users in a generous mood.

Get our latest blog posts delivered straight to your email inbox once a week for free. I have a subscription to Creo with the manufactuing package.

I love their first product, Solidworks, and I really tried to love Onshape. But even though a few people did find it usable as you have, I stand by what I said. I had to write them off when one of the company executives told me they flat out had no interest in the CNC market. In the end, they had a great product, but made a number of strategy mistakes that wound up forcing them to sell the company. I have about 20 files Documents running at any one time. Number has gotten as high as For me, it is quick, has some functions which are much quicker and easier to use than the equivalent in Creo.

If I need to cut metal, I use Creo 7. I was cornered into learning OnShape when I was corralled into teaching solid modeling at local college and that was what they were using.

I tried it, liked it, and use it exclusively for 3D printing. I use simplyfy3d for slicing and SheetCAM for flatwork on the router.

I talked to them. They offered a 30 day trial, but I demurred thinking that adding this to my list of other commitments would be unrealistic. If the combination had provided what I need Creo for I might have switched — cost would have been about same assuming I now had to pay pay for OnShape. Finally, I think what Bob has written above needs an explanation. He should check his sources and enlighten us. People are really quick at picking up the shortcomings of a new package compared to the one they know but not the things it does better.

There is also the problem of inertia where one keeps doing something the same way they have for 20 years and it works but in the meantime the software developer has devised a new improved method which is just astonishing and unknown to me.